https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425674 An incomprehensible system-generated GST cancellation notice that failed to state the factual basis for cancellation, and a mechanically issued order showing non-application of mind and internal inconsistency about whether a reply had been filed, were held liable to be quashed. The availability of revocation under Section 30 of the CGST Act did not bar writ relief where the digital process itself was defective and an effective response could not be made. Physical notices and orders were directed until the system issue was resolved, and the GST registration was ordered to be restored forthwith. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425674 An incomprehensible system-generated GST cancellation notice that failed to state the factual basis for cancellation, and a mechanically issued order showing non-application of mind and internal inconsistency about whether a reply had been filed, were held liable to be quashed. The availability of revocation under Section 30 of the CGST Act did not bar writ relief where the digital process itself was defective and an effective response could not be made. Physical notices and orders were directed until the system issue was resolved, and the GST registration was ordered to be restored forthwith. Case-Laws GST Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425674