<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1223 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty under section 271(1)(b) to be invalid due to procedural irregularities and lack of proper verification by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty of Rs.10,000 was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1223 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty under section 271(1)(b) to be invalid due to procedural irregularities and lack of proper verification by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty of Rs.10,000 was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>