<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1222 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal by the assessee. The penalty was levied for unaccounted income added by the Assessing Officer, despite the assessee&#039;s challenges and lack of specificity in the notice issued for penalty proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the agreement for the income addition during assessment and the lack of specific grounds raised by the assessee as reasons for upholding the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:13:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1222 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal by the assessee. The penalty was levied for unaccounted income added by the Assessing Officer, despite the assessee&#039;s challenges and lack of specificity in the notice issued for penalty proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the agreement for the income addition during assessment and the lack of specific grounds raised by the assessee as reasons for upholding the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>