<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425645</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Appellate Authority and Tribunal, ruling in favor of the Respondent-Company. The late fees charged for delayed filing of the Bill of Entry were deemed unwarranted as the company&#039;s actions were found to be bona fide. The court emphasized that the satisfaction for sufficiency of cause should be exercised judiciously, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision lacked proper application of mind. The Appeal was dismissed, with the court finding no substantial question of law raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425645</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Appellate Authority and Tribunal, ruling in favor of the Respondent-Company. The late fees charged for delayed filing of the Bill of Entry were deemed unwarranted as the company&#039;s actions were found to be bona fide. The court emphasized that the satisfaction for sufficiency of cause should be exercised judiciously, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision lacked proper application of mind. The Appeal was dismissed, with the court finding no substantial question of law raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>