<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1199 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425644</link>
    <description>The court held that the appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 was maintainable as it did not directly concern the rate of duty but rather the likelihood of injury to the domestic industry if the anti-dumping duty (ADD) was discontinued. The court rejected the objection raised by the respondents regarding the maintainability of the appeal and directed the Registry to list the appeal for further directions on the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1199 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425644</link>
      <description>The court held that the appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 was maintainable as it did not directly concern the rate of duty but rather the likelihood of injury to the domestic industry if the anti-dumping duty (ADD) was discontinued. The court rejected the objection raised by the respondents regarding the maintainability of the appeal and directed the Registry to list the appeal for further directions on the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>