<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1191 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425636</link>
    <description>For admission of a section 7 insolvency petition, default must be proved on reliable material. Where the alleged demand letter is seriously disputed and its authenticity is under challenge in parallel proceedings, the adjudicating authority will not conduct a summary trial of contested evidence. A balance-sheet entry by itself is insufficient to establish default, and the absence of the underlying agreement for an inter-corporate deposit weakens the creditor&#039;s case. The discussion also notes the debtor&#039;s reliance on section 10A, with the unresolved authenticity dispute going to the root of maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1191 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425636</link>
      <description>For admission of a section 7 insolvency petition, default must be proved on reliable material. Where the alleged demand letter is seriously disputed and its authenticity is under challenge in parallel proceedings, the adjudicating authority will not conduct a summary trial of contested evidence. A balance-sheet entry by itself is insufficient to establish default, and the absence of the underlying agreement for an inter-corporate deposit weakens the creditor&#039;s case. The discussion also notes the debtor&#039;s reliance on section 10A, with the unresolved authenticity dispute going to the root of maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>