https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425620 The appeal challenged the confirmation of a demand of Rs. 15,50,625 in the Order-in-Original. The Commissioner dropped the rest of the demand, which was not contested by the Revenue. The main issue was the wrongful availment of Cenvat Credit. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand but directed the appellant to submit relevant documentary evidence for reevaluation. The matter was remanded for a fresh examination within three months, emphasizing procedural fairness and proper evidence examination. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:09:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425620 The appeal challenged the confirmation of a demand of Rs. 15,50,625 in the Order-in-Original. The Commissioner dropped the rest of the demand, which was not contested by the Revenue. The main issue was the wrongful availment of Cenvat Credit. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand but directed the appellant to submit relevant documentary evidence for reevaluation. The matter was remanded for a fresh examination within three months, emphasizing procedural fairness and proper evidence examination. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425620