https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425618 The Delhi High Court refrained from providing a definitive opinion on the complete waiver of the disputed tax demand under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act. Acknowledging the plausible defense raised by the revenue regarding the limitation period under Section 34 in cases of remand by the Objection Hearing Authority, the Court directed the appellant to deposit 5% of the disputed demand within a specified timeline. This decision aimed to balance the interests of both parties and allowed the Tribunal to proceed with hearing the matter on its merits, emphasizing the complexity of the legal issues involved. en-us Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jul 2022 09:09:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425618 The Delhi High Court refrained from providing a definitive opinion on the complete waiver of the disputed tax demand under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act. Acknowledging the plausible defense raised by the revenue regarding the limitation period under Section 34 in cases of remand by the Objection Hearing Authority, the Court directed the appellant to deposit 5% of the disputed demand within a specified timeline. This decision aimed to balance the interests of both parties and allowed the Tribunal to proceed with hearing the matter on its merits, emphasizing the complexity of the legal issues involved. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425618