<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1269 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303531</link>
    <description>The High Court&#039;s discretion to extend the limitation period for filing a written statement was upheld because no legal error was found in its exercise. The applicable limitation framework had been extended or remained extendable up to 07.10.2021, so taking the written statement on record was valid. The challenge to the extension of limitation and the acceptance of the written statement was rejected, and the special leave petitions were dismissed with the interim order vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1269 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303531</link>
      <description>The High Court&#039;s discretion to extend the limitation period for filing a written statement was upheld because no legal error was found in its exercise. The applicable limitation framework had been extended or remained extendable up to 07.10.2021, so taking the written statement on record was valid. The challenge to the extension of limitation and the acceptance of the written statement was rejected, and the special leave petitions were dismissed with the interim order vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>