<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1871 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A due to insufficient evidence. However, the disallowances of BMC and Customs charges under Section 37(1) were deleted as they were considered compensatory and essential for business operations, not penalties for unlawful acts. The order was issued on 4th November 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1871 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance under Section 14A due to insufficient evidence. However, the disallowances of BMC and Customs charges under Section 37(1) were deleted as they were considered compensatory and essential for business operations, not penalties for unlawful acts. The order was issued on 4th November 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>