<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1265 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303517</link>
    <description>An application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found time-barred because the debt had defaulted and the account was declared NPA on 10.06.2014, while the application was filed on 19.09.2018, beyond the three-year limitation period. The balance-sheet entries did not extend limitation, as mandatory statutory financial statements were not treated as acknowledgement of debt under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The one-time settlement proposal also did not revive limitation because it was made after expiry of the original period. The application was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1265 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303517</link>
      <description>An application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found time-barred because the debt had defaulted and the account was declared NPA on 10.06.2014, while the application was filed on 19.09.2018, beyond the three-year limitation period. The balance-sheet entries did not extend limitation, as mandatory statutory financial statements were not treated as acknowledgement of debt under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The one-time settlement proposal also did not revive limitation because it was made after expiry of the original period. The application was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>