<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1369 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303515</link>
    <description>The judgment clarified that the CGST Act and MPGST Act are similar unless specific dissimilar provisions exist. The appeal was filed against an order of the Authority for Advance Ruling, concerning tax rates on contracts awarded by a government entity. The appellant, a power generating company, sought an advance ruling on tax rates for contracts related to government work. However, insufficient information hindered the AAR from determining the nature of supplies for tax purposes. The AAR found it challenging to ascertain the nature of supplies under Schedule II due to incomplete contract details provided by the appellant. The AAAR upheld the AAR&#039;s ruling, dismissing the appeal by the power generating company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1369 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303515</link>
      <description>The judgment clarified that the CGST Act and MPGST Act are similar unless specific dissimilar provisions exist. The appeal was filed against an order of the Authority for Advance Ruling, concerning tax rates on contracts awarded by a government entity. The appellant, a power generating company, sought an advance ruling on tax rates for contracts related to government work. However, insufficient information hindered the AAR from determining the nature of supplies for tax purposes. The AAR found it challenging to ascertain the nature of supplies under Schedule II due to incomplete contract details provided by the appellant. The AAAR upheld the AAR&#039;s ruling, dismissing the appeal by the power generating company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>