<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1232 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303503</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted for determination on substantial questions of law concerning deductions for an eligible or industrial undertaking, compliance with rule 18BBB, maintenance of separate books and audit reports for the eligible unit, allocation of profits between trading and production activities, and whether the activity constituted production rather than mining. The court also framed issues on SSI unit status, entitlement to additional depreciation, the necessity of filing Form 3AA with the return, acceptance of Form 3AA in revision proceedings, and alleged perversity in the appellate appreciation of evidence. Proceedings were admitted for consideration of these questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1232 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303503</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted for determination on substantial questions of law concerning deductions for an eligible or industrial undertaking, compliance with rule 18BBB, maintenance of separate books and audit reports for the eligible unit, allocation of profits between trading and production activities, and whether the activity constituted production rather than mining. The court also framed issues on SSI unit status, entitlement to additional depreciation, the necessity of filing Form 3AA with the return, acceptance of Form 3AA in revision proceedings, and alleged perversity in the appellate appreciation of evidence. Proceedings were admitted for consideration of these questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>