<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 858 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303501</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the stringent conditions for Private Tour Operators (PTOs) registration under the 2012 Haj Policy, emphasizing requirements such as a minimum office area, annual turnover, and security deposit. The Court directed improvements to the policy, including disclosure of arrangements and charges for pilgrims. Additionally, the Court ordered a gradual reduction and elimination of the Hajj subsidy over ten years, suggesting the diverted funds be used for community development. The Court criticized the arbitrary selection process for the Goodwill Hajj Delegation and recommended a more structured approach. Furthermore, the Court sought transparency in the allocation of special quotas for Hajj seats.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 858 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303501</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the stringent conditions for Private Tour Operators (PTOs) registration under the 2012 Haj Policy, emphasizing requirements such as a minimum office area, annual turnover, and security deposit. The Court directed improvements to the policy, including disclosure of arrangements and charges for pilgrims. Additionally, the Court ordered a gradual reduction and elimination of the Hajj subsidy over ten years, suggesting the diverted funds be used for community development. The Court criticized the arbitrary selection process for the Goodwill Hajj Delegation and recommended a more structured approach. Furthermore, the Court sought transparency in the allocation of special quotas for Hajj seats.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>