<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 769 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303500</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the legality of the 2011 Haj policy, including the requirement for Private Tour Operators (PTOs) to have a minimum office area of 250 sq. feet. However, it directed the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) to allocate the remaining 800 quotas by considering applications without insisting on the office area requirement. The final list of PTOs submitted to the Saudi authorities was not altered to prevent jeopardizing the pilgrimage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 769 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303500</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the legality of the 2011 Haj policy, including the requirement for Private Tour Operators (PTOs) to have a minimum office area of 250 sq. feet. However, it directed the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) to allocate the remaining 800 quotas by considering applications without insisting on the office area requirement. The final list of PTOs submitted to the Saudi authorities was not altered to prevent jeopardizing the pilgrimage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>