<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1163 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425608</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision regarding bad debts written off, affirming that the conditions for claiming deduction were met as the debts were considered in the Assessee&#039;s income and written off in the accounts. The Court found justification in the Appellant&#039;s claim as the debtor deemed the invoices &#039;not payable&#039; and no payments were received against the bad debts in the last seven Assessment Years. Consequently, the appeal challenging the addition made by the Assessing Officer was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1163 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425608</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision regarding bad debts written off, affirming that the conditions for claiming deduction were met as the debts were considered in the Assessee&#039;s income and written off in the accounts. The Court found justification in the Appellant&#039;s claim as the debtor deemed the invoices &#039;not payable&#039; and no payments were received against the bad debts in the last seven Assessment Years. Consequently, the appeal challenging the addition made by the Assessing Officer was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>