<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 59 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29622</link>
    <description>The court held that the tax borne by the employer, including tax on tax, constitutes &quot;salary&quot; for determining the value of rent perquisite under the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147(b) were deemed invalid as the information relied upon did not constitute fresh information but mere opinions, leading to a judgment in favor of the assessee against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 59 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29622</link>
      <description>The court held that the tax borne by the employer, including tax on tax, constitutes &quot;salary&quot; for determining the value of rent perquisite under the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147(b) were deemed invalid as the information relied upon did not constitute fresh information but mere opinions, leading to a judgment in favor of the assessee against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>