<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1132 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the provisions of section 194H were not applicable to discounts given to prepaid distributors. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and finding no error in the decision. The appeal was dismissed on 18.04.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:40:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1132 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the provisions of section 194H were not applicable to discounts given to prepaid distributors. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and finding no error in the decision. The appeal was dismissed on 18.04.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>