<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1111 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425556</link>
    <description>Additional evidence at the appellate stage under Section 391 CrPC is a discretionary power to be used sparingly, only when the material is necessary for a proper decision and to prevent failure of justice. It cannot be used to fill lacunae, introduce evidence that was available but withheld at trial, or convert an appeal into a retrial. The documents sought were found to be irrelevant, unsupported, unnecessary in light of existing defence evidence and admissions, and the application was made belatedly without satisfactory explanation. The appellate court&#039;s view that the request was aimed at delaying disposal of the appeal was upheld, and refusal to admit the evidence was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1111 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425556</link>
      <description>Additional evidence at the appellate stage under Section 391 CrPC is a discretionary power to be used sparingly, only when the material is necessary for a proper decision and to prevent failure of justice. It cannot be used to fill lacunae, introduce evidence that was available but withheld at trial, or convert an appeal into a retrial. The documents sought were found to be irrelevant, unsupported, unnecessary in light of existing defence evidence and admissions, and the application was made belatedly without satisfactory explanation. The appellate court&#039;s view that the request was aimed at delaying disposal of the appeal was upheld, and refusal to admit the evidence was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>