<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1671 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303485</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the addition of bogus purchases to 8% instead of 25%, noting that adding the entire amount would distort profit figures. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s adoption of an 8% gross profit rate reasonable given the inherent estimation involved. The disclosed sum of Rs.61.05 lakhs was appropriately assessed. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeals, stating no legal question arose, as the issues mirrored previous appeals and did not warrant separate reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:33:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1671 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303485</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the addition of bogus purchases to 8% instead of 25%, noting that adding the entire amount would distort profit figures. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s adoption of an 8% gross profit rate reasonable given the inherent estimation involved. The disclosed sum of Rs.61.05 lakhs was appropriately assessed. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeals, stating no legal question arose, as the issues mirrored previous appeals and did not warrant separate reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>