<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 11 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29612</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the entertainment allowance paid to the directors was considered part of their salary and not entertainment expenditure of the company. The court awarded costs and counsel&#039;s fee to the assessee, concluding the judgment in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:11:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 11 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29612</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the entertainment allowance paid to the directors was considered part of their salary and not entertainment expenditure of the company. The court awarded costs and counsel&#039;s fee to the assessee, concluding the judgment in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>