<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 760 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303473</link>
    <description>A conviction on appeal against acquittal cannot stand where the sole identifying witness is a very young child whose evidence contains material infirmities and is not safely corroborated. The Court noted that no test identification parade was held, the child&#039;s dock identification was unsafe, and his age made him vulnerable to tutoring. It also found that the co-accused&#039;s confession, recorded in police custody and while handcuffed, lacked the safeguards of voluntariness and had been retracted, while the recoveries and alleged motive were only weak corroborative material. As the trial court&#039;s appreciation of evidence was reasonable, the High Court was not justified in reversing the acquittal and the conviction and sentence were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 760 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303473</link>
      <description>A conviction on appeal against acquittal cannot stand where the sole identifying witness is a very young child whose evidence contains material infirmities and is not safely corroborated. The Court noted that no test identification parade was held, the child&#039;s dock identification was unsafe, and his age made him vulnerable to tutoring. It also found that the co-accused&#039;s confession, recorded in police custody and while handcuffed, lacked the safeguards of voluntariness and had been retracted, while the recoveries and alleged motive were only weak corroborative material. As the trial court&#039;s appreciation of evidence was reasonable, the High Court was not justified in reversing the acquittal and the conviction and sentence were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>