https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303471 An appellate court should interfere with an acquittal only for compelling and substantial reasons, and where two views are reasonably possible the one favourable to the accused must prevail. The prosecution cannot strengthen a doubtful case by introducing a new version to reconcile material inconsistencies between the ocular version and the medical evidence, especially where the medical evidence points to close-range firing and the stated occurrence does not fit. A statement can be treated as a dying declaration only if it is truly the voluntary statement of the deceased; a narration effectively supplied by another person and merely echoed by the injured does not qualify. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:52:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303471 An appellate court should interfere with an acquittal only for compelling and substantial reasons, and where two views are reasonably possible the one favourable to the accused must prevail. The prosecution cannot strengthen a doubtful case by introducing a new version to reconcile material inconsistencies between the ocular version and the medical evidence, especially where the medical evidence points to close-range firing and the stated occurrence does not fit. A statement can be treated as a dying declaration only if it is truly the voluntary statement of the deceased; a narration effectively supplied by another person and merely echoed by the injured does not qualify. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303471