<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1106 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425551</link>
    <description>Bail was granted after the appellant&#039;s undertaking to deposit the additional stipulated amounts within the stated time schedule was taken on record. The Court treated compliance with that undertaking as a condition for release and required the bail terms to be satisfied to the trial court&#039;s approval, in addition to the conditions already imposed. The operative effect was that the appellant&#039;s liberty depended on adherence to the payment schedule and the other bail conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1106 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425551</link>
      <description>Bail was granted after the appellant&#039;s undertaking to deposit the additional stipulated amounts within the stated time schedule was taken on record. The Court treated compliance with that undertaking as a condition for release and required the bail terms to be satisfied to the trial court&#039;s approval, in addition to the conditions already imposed. The operative effect was that the appellant&#039;s liberty depended on adherence to the payment schedule and the other bail conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>