<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1081 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425526</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The CIT(A)&#039;s approach of considering only the profit element from unrecorded receipts was upheld, and the revised return of income filed by the assessee was accepted. The decision emphasized that unrecorded receipts cannot be added in total as income without substantial evidence, and only the profit embedded should be considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1081 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425526</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The CIT(A)&#039;s approach of considering only the profit element from unrecorded receipts was upheld, and the revised return of income filed by the assessee was accepted. The decision emphasized that unrecorded receipts cannot be added in total as income without substantial evidence, and only the profit embedded should be considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>