<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1078 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425523</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of additions made by the AO for unexplained expenditure and cash payments disallowed under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and highlighted the inapplicability of legal provisions, such as Rule 6DD(j) and Section 132(4A), in its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1078 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425523</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of additions made by the AO for unexplained expenditure and cash payments disallowed under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and highlighted the inapplicability of legal provisions, such as Rule 6DD(j) and Section 132(4A), in its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>