<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1076 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order on all grounds. The Tribunal confirmed that the advances made were for business purposes, and the interest on these advances could not be disallowed. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deduction of employee&#039;s contribution to Provident Fund deposited before the due date of filing the return, in line with previous court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1076 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order on all grounds. The Tribunal confirmed that the advances made were for business purposes, and the interest on these advances could not be disallowed. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deduction of employee&#039;s contribution to Provident Fund deposited before the due date of filing the return, in line with previous court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>