<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1075 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425520</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, finding that the Commission followed a proper decision-making process in accordance with the law. The court held that the Settlement Commission&#039;s order was valid, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the decision-making process rather than the decision itself. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding non-compliance with disclosure requirements were not upheld, and the court found no fault with the legality of the procedure or the order. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs, and certain directions were given regarding the bank guarantee and refund if applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1075 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425520</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, finding that the Commission followed a proper decision-making process in accordance with the law. The court held that the Settlement Commission&#039;s order was valid, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the decision-making process rather than the decision itself. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding non-compliance with disclosure requirements were not upheld, and the court found no fault with the legality of the procedure or the order. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs, and certain directions were given regarding the bank guarantee and refund if applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>