<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1064 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425509</link>
    <description>On the undisputed fact that VAT had been regularly paid on the subject goods during the relevant period, a claim for service tax on the same transaction was not sustainable. The analysis turned on the factual basis that the tax liability had already been discharged under VAT, so the service tax demand on the same goods did not arise. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=686021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1064 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425509</link>
      <description>On the undisputed fact that VAT had been regularly paid on the subject goods during the relevant period, a claim for service tax on the same transaction was not sustainable. The analysis turned on the factual basis that the tax liability had already been discharged under VAT, so the service tax demand on the same goods did not arise. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>