https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303457 Where an insured truck was used to carry hazardous goods beyond the permit conditions and the policy's limited use clause, the SC held that the loss fell outside insurance coverage. The statutory scheme and motor vehicle rules permitted restriction of a goods carriage to unhazardous goods, and dangerous or hazardous cargo attracted special controls. On the facts, ether solvent was treated as ether, used synonymously with ethyl ether, and was therefore hazardous and flammable. Because the vehicle was carrying such goods contrary to the permit, the contract had to be enforced strictly within its limits, and the claim was not payable. en-us Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:52:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303457 Where an insured truck was used to carry hazardous goods beyond the permit conditions and the policy's limited use clause, the SC held that the loss fell outside insurance coverage. The statutory scheme and motor vehicle rules permitted restriction of a goods carriage to unhazardous goods, and dangerous or hazardous cargo attracted special controls. On the facts, ether solvent was treated as ether, used synonymously with ethyl ether, and was therefore hazardous and flammable. Because the vehicle was carrying such goods contrary to the permit, the contract had to be enforced strictly within its limits, and the claim was not payable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303457