<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs House Agent Avoids License Revocation; Security Forfeiture Annulled, Rs. 50,000 Penalty Imposed for Reporting Delay.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64780</link>
    <description>Seeking waiver of forfeiture of security as well as penalty imposed on CHA - time period for reporting the changes - It is noticed that the appellant has claimed that the delay occurred largely due to the fact that one of his partner died and he was not in a right frame of mind. It is noticed that the impugned order has, taking a lenient view, not revoked the license of the appellant - Taking into account the circumstances and the facts of the case, further lenient view is adopted. The case is not of a significant violation but only that of a delay in reporting. Moreover, the appellant did not process any document during this period. - the order of forfeiture of security deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs is set aside but the penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on the Customs Broker is sustained, for this lapse - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:22:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs House Agent Avoids License Revocation; Security Forfeiture Annulled, Rs. 50,000 Penalty Imposed for Reporting Delay.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64780</link>
      <description>Seeking waiver of forfeiture of security as well as penalty imposed on CHA - time period for reporting the changes - It is noticed that the appellant has claimed that the delay occurred largely due to the fact that one of his partner died and he was not in a right frame of mind. It is noticed that the impugned order has, taking a lenient view, not revoked the license of the appellant - Taking into account the circumstances and the facts of the case, further lenient view is adopted. The case is not of a significant violation but only that of a delay in reporting. Moreover, the appellant did not process any document during this period. - the order of forfeiture of security deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs is set aside but the penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on the Customs Broker is sustained, for this lapse - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:22:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>