https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303454 A voter enrolled in more than one Gram Panchayat was not barred under Section 11(6) of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 from casting votes in each Panchayat on the same day; the provision was read as prohibiting voting more than once in the same ward, not voting in different Gram Panchayats, so invalidation of those votes was unsustainable. A declaration that an election petitioner was duly elected could be made only when specifically claimed under the election rules and supported by proof of a majority of valid votes; Rule 15 did not enlarge that power, so the Tribunal could not grant the declaration incidentally. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:16:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303454 A voter enrolled in more than one Gram Panchayat was not barred under Section 11(6) of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 from casting votes in each Panchayat on the same day; the provision was read as prohibiting voting more than once in the same ward, not voting in different Gram Panchayats, so invalidation of those votes was unsustainable. A declaration that an election petitioner was duly elected could be made only when specifically claimed under the election rules and supported by proof of a majority of valid votes; Rule 15 did not enlarge that power, so the Tribunal could not grant the declaration incidentally. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303454