<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Assessee&#039;s Consistent Accounting Method for Excluding Service Tax from Contract Receipts; Overturns CIT(A) Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64764</link>
    <description>Addition on account of service tax that was collected but not paid - Grievance of the assessee that as he had not claimed any deduction of the amount of service-tax - Additions u/s 43B - no infirmity emerges from the accounting of the contract receipts by the assessee on the basis of exclusion method (i.e net of service-tax), which as observed by us hereinabove had consistently been followed by it since last many years. We, thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations set-aside the order of the CIT(Appeals) who had held that the accounting of the contract receipts by the assessee by adopting the exclusion method (i.e net of service-tax) was not proper. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:12:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Assessee&#039;s Consistent Accounting Method for Excluding Service Tax from Contract Receipts; Overturns CIT(A) Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64764</link>
      <description>Addition on account of service tax that was collected but not paid - Grievance of the assessee that as he had not claimed any deduction of the amount of service-tax - Additions u/s 43B - no infirmity emerges from the accounting of the contract receipts by the assessee on the basis of exclusion method (i.e net of service-tax), which as observed by us hereinabove had consistently been followed by it since last many years. We, thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations set-aside the order of the CIT(Appeals) who had held that the accounting of the contract receipts by the assessee by adopting the exclusion method (i.e net of service-tax) was not proper. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:12:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>