<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NCLT&#039;s Admission of Section 7 CIRP Application Overturned Due to Pending High Court Winding-Up Petition and Overlooked Orders.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64755</link>
    <description>Validity of order of NCLT admitting the application for CIRP - Although, pendency of winding-up petition before the High Court may not preclude filing of Section 7 Application, but in the present case, when there are various orders passed by Company Judge, in Company Petition No.355 of 1997, which has relevance and consequence on Section 7 Application, the orders passed in Company Petition ought to have been adverted by the Adjudicating Authority before admitting Section 7 Application - thus, Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting Section 7 Application, which did not deserve admission in the facts of the present case. - Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting Section 7 Application, which did not deserve admission in the facts of the present case as noticed above. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 11:18:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 11:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NCLT&#039;s Admission of Section 7 CIRP Application Overturned Due to Pending High Court Winding-Up Petition and Overlooked Orders.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64755</link>
      <description>Validity of order of NCLT admitting the application for CIRP - Although, pendency of winding-up petition before the High Court may not preclude filing of Section 7 Application, but in the present case, when there are various orders passed by Company Judge, in Company Petition No.355 of 1997, which has relevance and consequence on Section 7 Application, the orders passed in Company Petition ought to have been adverted by the Adjudicating Authority before admitting Section 7 Application - thus, Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting Section 7 Application, which did not deserve admission in the facts of the present case. - Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting Section 7 Application, which did not deserve admission in the facts of the present case as noticed above. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 11:18:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>