<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1022 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425467</link>
    <description>Fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit under GST, supported by suspicious and fictitious suppliers, was treated as a serious economic offence justifying denial of regular bail. The Court relied on material indicating prima facie involvement, substantial tax evasion, invoice movement without corresponding vehicle movement, and the risk of tampering with evidence or obstructing further investigation. Although the charge-sheet had been filed, further investigation was still continuing, and the gravity of the allegations and public interest in economic offences weighed against release. Bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1022 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425467</link>
      <description>Fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit under GST, supported by suspicious and fictitious suppliers, was treated as a serious economic offence justifying denial of regular bail. The Court relied on material indicating prima facie involvement, substantial tax evasion, invoice movement without corresponding vehicle movement, and the risk of tampering with evidence or obstructing further investigation. Although the charge-sheet had been filed, further investigation was still continuing, and the gravity of the allegations and public interest in economic offences weighed against release. Bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>