<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1011 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, allowing exemption for development fees collected from students and permitting the carry forward of the deficit to subsequent years. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of incriminating material and relied on binding judicial precedents to support its decision, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1011 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee, allowing exemption for development fees collected from students and permitting the carry forward of the deficit to subsequent years. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of incriminating material and relied on binding judicial precedents to support its decision, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>