<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 983 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425428</link>
    <description>The court quashed the adjudication order dated 21.11.2008, ruling that the continuation of proceedings post-compounding was impermissible under Section 15(2) of FEMA. The order was deemed invalid and without jurisdiction, leading to the cancellation of the show-cause notice and all related proceedings. The petitioners were granted relief as requested, with no costs imposed, as the adjudicating authority lost jurisdiction after the contravention was compounded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 983 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425428</link>
      <description>The court quashed the adjudication order dated 21.11.2008, ruling that the continuation of proceedings post-compounding was impermissible under Section 15(2) of FEMA. The order was deemed invalid and without jurisdiction, leading to the cancellation of the show-cause notice and all related proceedings. The petitioners were granted relief as requested, with no costs imposed, as the adjudicating authority lost jurisdiction after the contravention was compounded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>