<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 979 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as the appellant failed to adequately address suspicions and discrepancies raised by the Revenue regarding wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 979 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as the appellant failed to adequately address suspicions and discrepancies raised by the Revenue regarding wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>