https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425419 At the Section 11 stage, a seriously disputed plea of accord and satisfaction based on acceptance of the final bill need not be finally decided and may be left to the arbitral tribunal on a debatable factual matrix. By contrast, where the contract limited arbitration to notified claims and expressly excluded disputes on whether a claim was a notified claim, that exclusion was binding. Claims finally determined by the General Manager to be non-notified claims were treated as non-arbitrable, and arbitration was confined only to the notified claim where such a finding existed. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425419 At the Section 11 stage, a seriously disputed plea of accord and satisfaction based on acceptance of the final bill need not be finally decided and may be left to the arbitral tribunal on a debatable factual matrix. By contrast, where the contract limited arbitration to notified claims and expressly excluded disputes on whether a claim was a notified claim, that exclusion was binding. Claims finally determined by the General Manager to be non-notified claims were treated as non-arbitrable, and arbitration was confined only to the notified claim where such a finding existed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425419