<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1723 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303443</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled that the assessee could not be treated as &#039;assessee in default&#039; under section 201 of the Income-tax Act for non-deduction of tax at source on payments made towards interconnect charges, as these payments did not fall under sections 194J or 194C. Consequently, interest under section 201(1A) was not chargeable. The appeals and cross objections of the assessee were allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1723 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303443</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled that the assessee could not be treated as &#039;assessee in default&#039; under section 201 of the Income-tax Act for non-deduction of tax at source on payments made towards interconnect charges, as these payments did not fall under sections 194J or 194C. Consequently, interest under section 201(1A) was not chargeable. The appeals and cross objections of the assessee were allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>