<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2067 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303445</link>
    <description>The Court held that denying the petitioner the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses in a Central Excise case violated principles of natural justice. The Order-In-Original and corrigendum were quashed, and the respondents were directed to allow cross-examination of witnesses. The judgment stressed the importance of cross-examination in ensuring fairness and upholding natural justice in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2067 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303445</link>
      <description>The Court held that denying the petitioner the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses in a Central Excise case violated principles of natural justice. The Order-In-Original and corrigendum were quashed, and the respondents were directed to allow cross-examination of witnesses. The judgment stressed the importance of cross-examination in ensuring fairness and upholding natural justice in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>