<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1084 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303437</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that two companies were not related persons as defined by the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, regarding the pricing of excisable goods. The Court dismissed the appeals, stating the revenue failed to demonstrate any flaws in the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings. Consequently, the pricing was not deemed in violation of the law, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:42:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1084 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303437</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that two companies were not related persons as defined by the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, regarding the pricing of excisable goods. The Court dismissed the appeals, stating the revenue failed to demonstrate any flaws in the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings. Consequently, the pricing was not deemed in violation of the law, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>