https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303434 The Commission found that the respondent, Pizza Express, did not engage in unfair or restrictive trade practices by levying compulsory service charges. The charges were approved by the Department of Tourism and clearly displayed, not misleading customers. The Commission determined that the charges were part of the price for dining and did not harm consumers or competition. Consequently, the Notice of Enquiry was deemed not maintainable, and the respondent was discharged without costs. en-us Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:50:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303434 The Commission found that the respondent, Pizza Express, did not engage in unfair or restrictive trade practices by levying compulsory service charges. The charges were approved by the Department of Tourism and clearly displayed, not misleading customers. The Commission determined that the charges were part of the price for dining and did not harm consumers or competition. Consequently, the Notice of Enquiry was deemed not maintainable, and the respondent was discharged without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303434