<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 966 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425411</link>
    <description>The court quashed the complaint and all related proceedings against the petitioner due to the absence of a specific sanction for prosecuting him under Section 279 of the Income Tax Act. The petition was allowed, and the pending application was disposed of, with instructions to transmit the judgment to the Trial Court electronically and upload it on the website immediately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 966 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425411</link>
      <description>The court quashed the complaint and all related proceedings against the petitioner due to the absence of a specific sanction for prosecuting him under Section 279 of the Income Tax Act. The petition was allowed, and the pending application was disposed of, with instructions to transmit the judgment to the Trial Court electronically and upload it on the website immediately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>