https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425407 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and directing further review by the Assessing Officer. The petitioner's concerns regarding notice under Section 148 A (a) of the IT Act, failure to consider replies, source of transactions, timeliness of orders, and compliance with natural justice were addressed. The judgment emphasized additional submissions, a personal hearing, and reassessment by the Assessing Officer to ensure procedural compliance and fairness in the evaluation. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425407 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and directing further review by the Assessing Officer. The petitioner's concerns regarding notice under Section 148 A (a) of the IT Act, failure to consider replies, source of transactions, timeliness of orders, and compliance with natural justice were addressed. The judgment emphasized additional submissions, a personal hearing, and reassessment by the Assessing Officer to ensure procedural compliance and fairness in the evaluation. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425407