<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 952 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the additions of interest on capital and share of profit as they were already disclosed in the return of income. The Tribunal highlighted the incorrectness of taxing the interest under u/s.115BBE and emphasized the impermissibility of double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 952 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the additions of interest on capital and share of profit as they were already disclosed in the return of income. The Tribunal highlighted the incorrectness of taxing the interest under u/s.115BBE and emphasized the impermissibility of double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>