<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 947 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) related to Transfer Pricing adjustments. It emphasized that the assessee conducted the Transfer Pricing study in good faith and with due diligence, in accordance with section 92C. The Tribunal found no specific defects in the study and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 947 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) related to Transfer Pricing adjustments. It emphasized that the assessee conducted the Transfer Pricing study in good faith and with due diligence, in accordance with section 92C. The Tribunal found no specific defects in the study and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>