<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 930 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425375</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed through remand, with the Tribunal remitting the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant was given the opportunity to file missing shipping bills under the condition of not delaying the process and cooperating promptly. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to issue a fresh adjudication order within six months. All arguments were left open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 930 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425375</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed through remand, with the Tribunal remitting the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant was given the opportunity to file missing shipping bills under the condition of not delaying the process and cooperating promptly. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to issue a fresh adjudication order within six months. All arguments were left open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>