https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425371 The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner Service Tax, New Delhi lacked jurisdiction over the appellant's operations in Rajasthan, setting aside the demand related to this issue. Regarding the admissibility of abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST for contracts with GAIL Chainsa and VB Builders, the Tribunal remanded the matter for reassessment due to new evidence provided by the appellant. Similarly, for the issue of submission of necessary documents for work contracts, the Tribunal remanded the matter for re-examination based on the newly submitted documents. The appeal was allowed accordingly. en-us Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Mar 2023 17:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425371 The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner Service Tax, New Delhi lacked jurisdiction over the appellant's operations in Rajasthan, setting aside the demand related to this issue. Regarding the admissibility of abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST for contracts with GAIL Chainsa and VB Builders, the Tribunal remanded the matter for reassessment due to new evidence provided by the appellant. Similarly, for the issue of submission of necessary documents for work contracts, the Tribunal remanded the matter for re-examination based on the newly submitted documents. The appeal was allowed accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425371