<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 918 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425363</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to exemption from VAT on Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) sales under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act. The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel could not override statutory provisions, leading to the denial of the petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption. The judgment granting relief based on promissory estoppel was set aside, and the petitioner&#039;s appeal for exemption was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 918 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425363</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to exemption from VAT on Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) sales under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act. The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel could not override statutory provisions, leading to the denial of the petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption. The judgment granting relief based on promissory estoppel was set aside, and the petitioner&#039;s appeal for exemption was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>